From 3D printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds: A hybrid material extrusion and vat polymerization bioprinting approach for soft matter constructs

Zainab N. Khan, Hamed I. Albalawi, Alexander U. Valle-Pérez, Ali Aldoukhi, Noofa Hammad, Elena Herrera-Ponce de León, Sherin Abdelrahman, Charlotte A. E. Hauser

Article ID: 7
Vol 1, Issue 1, 2022, Article identifier:7

VIEWS - 128 (Abstract) 23 (Full-Text /) 7 (Suppl. File (Video))

Abstract


Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting methods vary in difficulty and complexity depending on the application desired and biomaterials used. 3D biofabrication is gaining increased traction with enhanced additive manufacturing technologies. Yet, high print resolution and efficiency for the fabrication of complex constructs still prove to be challenging. An intricate balance between biomaterial composition, machine maneuverability, and extrusion mechanism is required. While soft bioinks are highly desirable when used as a biodegradable scaffold material for tissue and organ fabrication, mechanical stiffness and shape fidelity are often compromised. Alternately, post-printing ultraviolet and chemical crosslinking processes improve fidelity but threaten cell viability. Herein, we propose a hybrid fabrication approach to facilitate 3D bioprinting using soft bioinks with instantaneous gelation properties while maintaining shape fidelity for tissue and organ structures of complex geometries. The approach entails a multi-step “3D Printed Molds to Scaffolds” method, which uses additive manufacturing to create accurate negative support structures for the desired construct. A tissue or organ model is first designed in computer-aided design (CAD) modeling software to create a negative mold structure of the desired tissue or organ. Using a Formlabs® SLA 3D printer, the negative mold is fabricated at desired scale using a biocompatible elastic resin. Then, a robotic 3D bioprinting system is loaded with a sliced g-code of the CAD model. The robot start position is aligned with the placement of the fabricated mold on the printbed. Microfluidic pumps deliver three solutions through a customized nozzle to extrude peptide bioink, which gels instantaneously. The initial layers of the structure are formed within the mold to create a solid foundation of the construct. The hybrid approach was found to enhance fidelity considerably and enabled the printing of a complex human ear structure. It is promising for tissue and organ fabrication as it offers a cost-effective support structure without increasing printing time. It could also be used as a rapid prototyping approach for researchers who do not have access to 3D bioprinting systems. Biofabrication, from printed molds to bioprinted scaffolds, will potentially enhance the printing experience with soft bioinks while preserving cell durability and viability. 


Keywords


3D Bioprinting; Vat polymerization; Tissue engineering; 3D molds; Peptide hydrogels; Soft bioinks

References


Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32: 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958

Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al. 2019, Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 6: 011310. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393

Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120: 10793-10833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008

Ng WL, Lee JM, Yeong WY, et al., 2017, Microvalve-based bioprinting-process, bio-inks and applications. Biomater Sci, 5: 632–647.

Dou C, Perez V, Qu J, et al., 2021, A state‐of‐the‐art review of laser‐assisted bioprinting and its future research trends. Chem Bio Eng Rev, 8: 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202000037

Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization-based bioprinting process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12: 022001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab6034

Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent advances in formulating and processing biomaterial inks for vat polymerization‐based 3D printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 9: 2000156. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156

Ahangar P, Cooke ME, Weber MH, et al., 2019. Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl Sci, 9: 1713.

Guzzi EA, Tibbitt MW, 2020, Additive manufacturing of precision biomaterials. Adv Mater, 32: 1901994.

Albalawi HI, Khan ZN, Valle-Pérez AU, et al., 2021, Sustainable and eco-friendly coral restoration through 3d printing and fabrication. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 9: 12634-12645.

Sasmal P, Datta P, Wu Y, et al., 2018, 3D bioprinting for modelling vasculature. Microphysiol Syst, 2: 9. https://doi.org/10.21037/mps.2018.10.02

Janarthanan G, Shin HS, Kim IG, et al., 2020, Self-crosslinking hyaluronic acid–carboxymethylcellulose hydrogel enhances multilayered 3D-printed construct shape integrity and mechanical stability for soft tissue engineering. Biofabrication, 12: 045026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2f7

Gopinathan J, Noh I, 2018, Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater Res, 22: 11.

Avila-Ramírez A, Valle-Pérez AU, Susapto HH, et al., 2021, Ecologically friendly biofunctional ink for reconstruction of rigid living systems under wet conditions. In J Bioprint, 7: 398. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.398

Tirella A, Orsini A, Vozzi G, et al., 2009, A phase diagram for microfabrication of geometrically controlled hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication, 1: 045002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/1/4/045002

Poldervaart MT, Goversen B, de Ruijter M, et al., 2017, 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. PLoS One, 12: e0177628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177628

Susapto HH, Alhattab D, Abdelrahman S, et al., 2021, Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed tissue constructs. Nano Lett, 21: 2719–2729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04426

Hauser CA, Deng R, Mishra A, et al., 2011, Natural tri- to hexapeptides self-assemble in water to amyloid β-type fiber aggregates by unexpected á-helical intermediate structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 108: 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014796108

Loo Y, Lakshmanan A, Ni M, et al., 2015, Peptide bioink: Self-assembling nanofibrous scaffolds for three-dimensional organotypic cultures. Nano Lett, 15: 6919–6925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02859

Advincula RC, Dizon JR, Caldona EB, et al., 2021, On the progress of 3D-printed hydrogels for tissue engineering. MRS Commun, 11: 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-021-00069-1

Spicer CD, 2020, Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: The importance of polymer choice. Polym Chem, 11: 184–219.

Naahidi S, Jafari M, Logan M, et al., 2017, Biocompatibility of hydrogel-based scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol Adv, 35: 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.05.006

Khansari MM, Sorokina LV, Mukherjee P, et al., 2017, Classification of hydrogels based on their source: A review and application in stem cell regulation. JOM, 69: 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2412-9

Anandakrishnan N, Ye H, Guo Z, et al., 2020, Fast 3D printing of large-scale biocompatible hydrogel models. BioRxiv, 2020: 345660. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.22.345660

Morioka M, Sakakibara S, 2010, A new cell production assembly system with human-robot cooperation. CIRP Ann, 59: 9–12.

Bhatt PM, Malhan RK, Shembekar AV, et al., 2020, Expanding capabilities of additive manufacturing through use of robotics technologies: A survey. Addit Manuf, 31: 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100933

Urhal P, Weightman A, Diver C, et al., 2019, Robot assisted additive manufacturing: A review. Robot. Comput Integr Manuf, 59: 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.005

Song X, Pan Y, Chen Y, 2015, Development of a low-cost parallel kinematic machine for multidirectional additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng, 137: 021005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028897

Alrashoudi AA, Albalawi HI, Aldoukhi AH, et al., 2021, Fabrication of a lateral flow assay for rapid in-field detection of COVID-19 antibodies using additive manufacturing printing technologies. Int J Bioprint, 7: 399. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.399

Khan Z, Kahin K, Rauf S, et al., 2018, Optimization of a 3D bioprinting process using ultrashort peptide bioinks. Int J Bioprint, 5: 173. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i1.173

Kahin K, Khan Z, Albagami M, et al., 2019, Development of a robotic 3D bioprinting and microfluidic pumping system for tissue and organ engineering. In: Gray BL, Becker H, editors. Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XVII (SPIE, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2507237

Khan Z, Kahin K, Hauser C, 2021, Time-dependent pulsing of microfluidic pumps to enhance 3D bioprinting of peptide bioinks. In: Gray BL, Becker H, editors. Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems XIX (SPIE, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2578830

Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print me an organ! Why we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97: 101145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145

Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, et al., 2015, Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv, 1: e1500758. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500758




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i1.7

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.